The Worst Month of the Year
We noted last week that September was historically a rough one for stocks and after one week, that is playing out, as stocks just had their worst week since the Regional Bank crisis in March 2023. But let’s look at the bigger picture before we dive into the minutia of markets. The S&P 500 has been higher every month this year except April. In fact, after the big reversal during August, stocks have been higher nine of the past 10 months. Trees don’t grow forever and stocks can’t just go up forever either. As we enter the period before the election, the odds of more volatility are rather high.
August was quite the rollercoaster, but in the end the S&P 500 added 2.3% for its fourth consecutive monthly gain. On top of that, all four months gained at least 1%. As we noted many times the past few months, the best three months of the year during an election year have been June, July, and August. Well, that played out nicely once again, with the S&P 500 up 7.0% in the summer months this year, right in line with the 7.3% average. Many told us to be fearful and expect summer weakness, but we held firm and expected a nice rally and that fortunately has happened.
Are we still bullish? Yes, we remain overweight equities, which is where we have been since December 2022. But we can’t ignore the potential for some pre-election jitters and seasonal weakness over the coming two months. September has been the worst month of the year the past 10 years, 20 years, and since 1950. In election years it is the third worst month (February and October have been worse).
Here’s a better look at election years and monthly returns. August bucked early month weakness this year and turned in a solid gain, but the next two months are notorious for weakness in election years. The good news? Year-end rallies are quite normal after the election is out of the way.
What happened recently after a long monthly win streak heading into September? There was a five-month win streak heading into September in 2020 and stocks fell nearly 4%. There was also a seven-month win streak last year at this time that ended with a nearly 5% drop in September.
Here’s a nice way of showing that election years tend to rally in the usually weak summer months (like we saw in 2024), but also tend to peak right around now with weakness into late October perfectly normal.
Lastly, this year and last year look a lot alike. This is a sample size of one, but it’s worth noting last year saw weakness into late October before a furious end of year rally.
One more. Think about the last two elections. 2016 and 2020 both saw stock weakness ahead of contentious elections, only to see stocks soar at the end of the year once the election uncertainty was behind us. So buckle up, as we wouldn’t be surprised at all to see that pattern play out once again this year.
Let’s Not Sugar Coat It – Labor Market Risks Are Rising
The August payroll report was kind of ok on the face of it. Payrolls grew by 142,000 in August, below expectations for a 165,000 increase but these things are noisy. The unemployment rate also declined from 4.3% to 4.2%, which is welcome. However, read one step beyond headlines and it’s fairly clear the labor market is softening. That does not mean we’re in a recession, or one is imminent – it just means risks are rising, and the Federal Reserve (Fed) needs to act.
As I noted above, monthly payroll gains are noisy and so it helps to take an average. With revisions to June and July, monthly payroll gains have now averaged just 116,000 over the past three months. That’s barely enough to keep up with population growth, and a deterioration from earlier this year. The 3-month average was running around 199,000 back in March (after including recent benchmark revisions by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which took April 2023-March 2024 payroll growth from 2.9 million to 2.1 million).
The unemployment rate has been rising as well – it was just 3.7% when we started 2024 and is now at 4.2% (unrounded, the unemployment rate fell from 4.25% in July to 4.22% in August). Historically, when the unemployment rises, it continues to rise. That leads to a negative feedback loop between hiring and spending (lower incomes leading to lower spending), which ultimately results in a recession.
This dynamic is neatly captured in the Sahm Rule, which says that when the 3-month average of the unemployment rate moves 0.50 or more percentage points above the lowest point of that average over the last 12 months, the economy is likely in the early months of a recession. It’s correctly indicated every recession since 1970. The bad news is that the Sahm Rule triggered in July and remains triggered in August. The good news is that the preponderance of economic data clearly tells us we’re not in a recession right now. Claudia Sahm herself, the author of the rule, has suggested that the rule may be broken this cycle and things may be different this time. Instead of weak demand, the unemployment rate may be rising due to an increase in the supply of workers (who can’t find jobs easily). The Sahm rule doesn’t distinguish between these two dynamics.
In any case, hiring has stalled. The hiring rate, which is hires as a percent of employment, has fallen to 3.4%. Other than during the heights of the pandemic, the last time hiring was at this level was in 2014. It’s unclear why employers have stopped hiring as much as they have. It could be economic uncertainty, policy uncertainty from the Fed and Washington, or simply that employers hired too many people in 2021-2022 and have no need to increase payrolls immediately.
Risks Rising Doesn’t Mean Recession Is Here or Near
The only solace in the deteriorating trends is that that they’re very gradual. Plus, other labor market data suggest that the labor market is in a reasonable place right now. It’s just that the trend is in the wrong direction. But it’s worth highlighting the positive data points.
We like to look at the “prime-age” (25-54 years) employment-population ratio, since it gets around definitional issues that crop up with the unemployment rate (someone is counted as being “unemployed” only if they’re “actively looking for a job”) or demographics (an aging population with more people retiring and leaving the labor force every day). The prime-age employment population ratio was unchanged at 80.9% in August. That’s higher than anything we saw between 2001 and 2019 (when it peaked at 80.4%). In fact, for women, this ratio is at 75.6%, only a tick below the highest we’ve seen (75.7% back in May). This by itself should tell you the labor market is still quite healthy, with more people participating in it. This supports Claudia Sahm’s view that the Sahm Rule has triggered because of more workers coming into the labor force, rather than weak demand.
Layoffs are also low, which should also tell you we’re not in the middle of a recession or very close to one. The layoff rate, which is layoffs as a percent of employment, is running at 1.1%. That’s historically low. For perspective, it was running around 1.2-1.3% from 2017-2019, and around 1.3-1.6% from 2005-2007. Also, initial claims for unemployment benefits, which is one of the better leading economic indicators out there (if you had to pick one) still shows layoffs remain low, in line with what we saw in 2023 amid a strong labor market and even 2018-20019. The “insured unemployment rate,” which measures the number of unemployed people continuing to receive unemployment benefits as a percent of covered employment, is at 1.2% – above where it was pre-pandemic. All of this tells you that people aren’t at great risk of losing jobs, but finding a job has gotten harder (which is why continuing claims for benefits are higher).
So, as you can see, the labor market is still in a reasonably healthy place if the downtrend stops. The good news is that the downtrends can likely be arrested, or even reversed, if the Fed acts to cut off the risks that have clearly risen. The Fed can act on Chair Powell’s recent comments that they do not “seek or welcome further cooling in labor market conditions” with a bigger-than-expected interest rate cut of 0.5%-points at their September meeting, instead of opting for a more gradual approach that will clearly indicate institutional inertia in the face of rising risks. As Powell himself said, with the policy rate target currently at 5.25-5.50%, the Fed has ample room to respond to risks.
We know the labor market is trending down. The big question going forward is how quickly the Fed responds to get in front of that trend to potentially reverse it.
This newsletter was written and produced by CWM, LLC. Content in this material is for general information only and not intended to provide specific advice or recommendations for any individual. All performance referenced is historical and is no guarantee of future results. All indices are unmanaged and may not be invested into directly. The views stated in this letter are not necessarily the opinion of any other named entity and should not be construed directly or indirectly as an offer to buy or sell any securities mentioned herein. Due to volatility within the markets mentioned, opinions are subject to change without notice. Information is based on sources believed to be reliable; however, their accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
S&P 500 – A capitalization-weighted index of 500 stocks designed to measure performance of the broad domestic economy through changes in the aggregate market value of 500 stocks representing all major industries.
The NASDAQ 100 Index is a stock index of the 100 largest companies by market capitalization traded on NASDAQ Stock Market. The NASDAQ 100 Index includes publicly-traded companies from most sectors in the global economy, the major exception being financial services.
A diversified portfolio does not assure a profit or protect against loss in a declining market.
Compliance Case # 02400621_090924_C
